Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR823 14
Original file (NR823 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7901 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

TUR
Docket No: 823-1
12 February 2015

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 February 2015. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

tr

fter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy, began a period of active duty on 3
January 2007, and served without disciplinary infraction.

Your record reflects that on 5 April 2007, you were referred for
a psychiatric evaluation due to your intense reactivity mood,
depression, anxiety, reaction to normal stressors of advanced
military training, and thoughts of suicide. You were diagnosed
with an adjustment disorder with a mixed and depressed mood and
borderline personality disorder, both of which existed prior to

a

your enlistment. The record also reflects that you were deemed a

risk for retention because of your deteriorating mood and
functioning and that an operational setting would place you and
others at significant risk. As a result, you were recommended
for an immediate administrative separation.

Subsequently, after waiving your procedural rights, your
commanding officer recommended separation under honorable
conditions by reason of erroneous entry due to a defective
enlistment. On 23 April 2007, the discharge authority approved
the foregoing recommendation and directed separation under
honorable conditions by reason of erroneous entry with the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code, and on 26 April 2007,
you were so discharged.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to upgrade your discharge and change your narrative
reason for separation and reenlistment code. It also considered
your assertion that you were separated due to your failure to
comply with the Navy Family Care Plan (NFCP). Nevertheless, the
Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
relief in your case because of the diagnosed adjustment and
borderline personality disorders which resulted in your
nonrecommendation for retention and reenlistment. Further, you
were given an opportunity to defend your actions, but waived your
procedural rights. Finally, the Board concluded that your
assertion of being separated because you did not comply with NFCP
is without merit since you were processed for separation due

solely to your erroneous entry. Accordingly, your application
has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08401-06

    Original file (08401-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 6 May 1998 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed dysthymia and conduct disorders. Further, an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized when a Sailor is separated by reason of erroneous entry due to psychological...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00

    Original file (06039-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06101-08

    Original file (06101-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder and are considered a potential risk to harm themselves or others if retained. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05148-02

    Original file (05148-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 December 1994 you were diagnosed On 29 On 5 January 1995 you were notified that separation action was being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04477-06

    Original file (04477-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable mate ial error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 October 1998 at age 21. You then served without incident until 6...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501551

    Original file (ND0501551.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SR was informed regarding their condition and was recommended to seek treatment, SR is suitable to report to Separations Division. 990422: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as general (under honorable conditions) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by a borderline personality disorder and convenience of the government due to physical or mental conditions as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10600-09

    Original file (10600-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicabie statutes, regulations, and policies. On 27 Pebruary 2007 you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason OL erroneous entry due to the diagnosed psychiatric problems. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11176-06

    Original file (11176-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 November 2002 at age 20. After review, a clinical psychologist...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00845

    Original file (MD02-00845.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00845 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020522, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :010516: Medical evaluation: Recommend administrative separation at the convenience of the government for failure to adapt. The Board found that in the Applicant’s case, the characterization of service should have been the “type warranted by service record.” A review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04550-08

    Original file (04550-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder and are considered a potential risk to harm themselves or others if retained. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...